Tạp chí Tim mạch học Việt Nam

Article detail

Article detail description

Home
NGHIÊN CỨU LÂM SÀNG Issue: Số 105 năm 2023 BỆNH SUY TIM

PREDICTIVE VALUE OF THE ELAN – HF SOCRE IN HEART FAILURE PAITIENTS WITH REDUCED EJECTION FRACTION

Nguyễn Thị Tuyết: Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội; Phan Thị Lan Anh: Bệnh viện Việt Nam - Thụy Điển, Uông Bí; Nguyễn Thị Bạch Yến: Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội; Trần Ngọc Cầm: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam, Bệnh viện Bạch Mai; Lã Thị Dương: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam, Bệnh viện Bạch Mai; Lê Thị Mến: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam, Bệnh viện Bạch Mai; Đỗ Đình Hùng: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam, Bệnh viện Bạch Mai; Nguyễn Hoàng Long: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam, Bệnh viện Bạch Mai; Khổng Nam Hương: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam, Bệnh viện Bạch Mai;
Published: May 31, 2023
Views: 151

Abstract

Objectives: (1) To describe the characteristics and ELAN – HF score in hospitalized heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). (2) To evaluate external validation of the ELAN‐HF (European Collaboration on Acute Decompensated Heart Failure) score to predict the combined endpoint of HF hospitalizations or death six months after discharge.

Methods: 96 patients diagnosed with HFrEF at Vietnam National Heart Institute were studied. Clinical and laboratory parameters of the patients on admission and discharge were collected then we calculated the ELAN – HF score. Patients were monitored for mortality, first HF re-hospitalization in six months after discharge.

Results: Most patients in the study had ELAN - HF scores in the intermediate-risk and high-risk categories, with rates of 54.2% and 27.1%, respectively. During a mean follow-up time of 6 months, 22,9% died, 39,6% were rehospitalized for HF, and 64,6% had an HF hospitalization and/or death. The median risk score in patients with events was significantly higher than that in patients without events (3.76±1.35 and 2.21±1.14, respectively, p<0.001). The results of Cox regression analysis showed that ELAN – HF score was an independent predictor of the combined endpoint of mortality or hospitalization due to HF (HR = 3,18; 95%CI: 1,65-5,82). The ELAN - HF score demonstrated modestly for 6-month mortality (AUC=0.74, 95% CI 0.64 – 0.85) but showed good discrimination capacity for combined mortality and HF hospitalization (AUC=0.88, 95% CI 0.81 – 0.94).

Conclusion: The ELAN – HF risk score is a simple, easy-to-use, yet powerful stratification method for both mortality and HF hospitalization in HF with reduced ejection fraction.

References

1.
Heidenreich PA, Albert NM, Allen LA, et al. Forecasting the impact of heart failure in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Heart Fail. 2013;6(3):606-619. doi:10.1161/HHF.0b013e318291329a
2.
Salah K, Kok WE, Eurlings LW, et al. A novel discharge risk model for patients hospitalised for acute decompensated heart failure incorporating N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels: a European coLlaboration on Acute decompeNsated Heart Failure: ELAN-HF Score. Heart Br Card Soc. 2014;100(2):115-125. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2013-303632
3.
Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(27):2129-2200. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128
4.
Hoang TH, Nguyen TBY, Nguyen TTH, Do DL. Prognostic value of left ventricular longitudinal strain by spekle - tracking echocardiography in patients with chronic heart failure. Journal of Vietnamese Cardiology. 2016.
5.
Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America. Circulation. 2017;136(6):e137-e161. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000509
6.
Sawano M, Shiraishi Y, Kohsaka S, et al. Performance of the MAGGIC heart failure risk score and its modification with the addition of discharge natriuretic peptides. ESC Heart Fail. 2018;5(4):610-619. doi:10.1002/ehf2.12278
7.
Khanam SS, Choi E, Son JW, et al. Validation of the MAGGIC (Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure) heart failure risk score and the effect of adding natriuretic peptide for predicting mortality after discharge in hospitalized patients with heart failure. PloS One. 2018;13(11):e0206380. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0206380
8.
Bettencourt P, Azevedo A, Pimenta J, Friões F, Ferreira S, Ferreira A. N-terminal-pro-brain natriuretic peptide predicts outcome after hospital discharge in heart failure patients. Circulation. 2004;110(15):2168-2174. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000144310.04433.BE
9.
Zile MR, Claggett BL, Prescott MF, et al. Prognostic Implications of Changes in N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Patients With Heart Failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(22):2425-2436. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2016.09.931
10.
Salah K, Stienen S, Moons AHM, et al. External Validation of the ELAN‐HF Score, Predicting 6‐Month All‐Cause Mortality in Patients Hospitalized for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(14):e010309. doi:10.1161/JAHA.118.010309
11.
Le NA, Nguyen NQ. Evaluation of survival in patients with end-stage chronic heart failure and some related factors at Vietnam National Heart Institute. Journal of Vietnamese Cardiology. 2017.

Files

Article Views151
Document Views0
Downloads0
Section NGHIÊN CỨU LÂM SÀNG
Category BỆNH SUY TIM