Tạp chí Tim mạch học Việt Nam

Article detail

Article detail description

Home
BÀI TỔNG QUAN Issue: Số 107S BỆNH SUY TIM

Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock

Phạm Minh Tuấn: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam; Tạ Mạnh Cường: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam, Bệnh viện Bạch Mai;
Published: January 20, 2024
Views: 15

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock is a complex and heterogeneous pathological condition characterized by impaired contractile function of the heart. The goal of cardiogenic shock treatment is to improve abnormal hemodynamics and maintain adequate tissue perfusion. If hypotension and inadequate tissue perfusion persist despite initial therapy, temporary mechanical circulatory support (t-MCS) should be initiated. This decade has witnessed the advent of a new era in cardiogenic shock management by the use of t-MCS through accumulated experience with intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP) and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO), as well as revolutionary novel devices or systems like axial flow pumps (Impella) and the combination of VA-ECMO and Impella (ECPELLA) based on knowledge of circulatory physiology. In this transitional phase, we refined our cardiogenic shock management strategy using t-MCS. The management strategy involves carefully choosing single or combining t-MCS devices based on the characteristics of each device and the specific pathological condition. This selection is guided by hemodynamic monitoring, shock staging, risk stratification, and coordinated management by a multidisciplinary shock team.

Keywords
Cardiogenic shock

References

1.
Shirakabe A, Matsushita M, Shibata Y, et al. Organ dysfunction, injury, and failure in cardiogenic shock. J Intensive Care. 2023;11(1):26. doi:10.1186/s40560-023-00676-1
2.
Harjola VP, Lassus J, Sionis A, et al. Clinical picture and risk prediction of short-term mortality in cardiogenic shock [published correction appears in Eur J Heart Fail. 2015;17(9):984]. Eur J Heart Fail. 2015;17(5):501-509. doi:10.1002/ejhf.260
3.
Henry TD, Tomey MI, Tamis-Holland JE, et al. Invasive Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021;143(15):e815-e829. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000959
4.
Hunziker L, Radovanovic D, Jeger R, et al. Twenty-Year Trends in the Incidence and Outcome of Cardiogenic Shock in AMIS Plus Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(4):e007293. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007293
5.
Miyachi H, Yamamoto T, Takayama M, et al. 10-Year Temporal Trends of In-Hospital Mortality and Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction. JACC Asia. 2022;2(6):677-688. Published 2022 Oct 4. doi:10.1016/j.jacasi.2022.06.005
6.
Nishimoto Y, Ohbe H, Matsui H, et al. Trends in Mechanical Circulatory Support Use and Outcomes of Patients With Cardiogenic Shock in Japan, 2010 to 2020 (from a Nationwide Inpatient Database Study). Am J Cardiol. 2023;203:203-211. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.06.082
7.
Suga H, Yamada O, Goto Y. Energetics of ventricular contraction as traced in the pressure-volume diagram. Fed Proc. 1984;43(9):2411-2413.
8.
Suga H, Igarashi Y, Yamada O, et al. Cardiac oxygen consumption and systolic pressure volume area. Basic Res Cardiol. 1986;81 Suppl 1:39-50. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-11374-5_5
9.
Parissis H. Haemodynamic effects of the use of the intraaortic balloon pump. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2007;48(6):346-351.
10.
Nichols AB, Pohost GM, Gold HK, et al. Left ventricular function during intra-aortic balloon pumping assessed by multigated cardiac blood pool imaging. Circulation. 1978;58(3 Pt 2):I176-I183.
Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock

Files

Article Views15
Document Views0
Downloads0
Section BÀI TỔNG QUAN
Issue Số 107S
Category BỆNH SUY TIM
Pages 169-175
Copyright Holder 2024 Tạp chí Tim mạch học Việt Nam