Tạp chí Tim mạch học Việt Nam

Article detail

Article detail description

Home
NGHIÊN CỨU LÂM SÀNG Issue: Số 106 năm 2023

Midterm results of endarectomy in treating atherosclerotic carotid artery disease at Dong Nai Provinicial General Hospital

Võ Tuấn Anh: Bệnh viện Đa khoa Đồng Nai; Kiều Minh Sơn: Bệnh viện Đa khoa Đồng Nai;
Published: August 1, 2023
Views: 71

Abstract

Introduction: Stroke is one of the leading causes of death and disability worldwide. Carotid endarterectomy for atherosclerotic carotid stenosis has been proved to reduce the incidence of cerebral infarction.

Objective: To evaluate the early and mid-term results of carotid endarterectomy at Dong Nai General Hospital from January 2017 to October 2023.

Subjects and methods: All patients underwent carotid endarterectomy surgery patients at Dong Nai general hospital from January 2017 to October 2023. A retrospective descriptive study of a case series was performed.

Results: From January 2017 to October 2023, we have 89 patients underwent carotid endarterectomy, including 77 men (86.5%) and 12 women (13.5%), the average age is 65 ,2 ± 11,1; 49 patients (55.1%) were symptomatic. Anesthesia methods: General anesthesia for 85 patients (95.6%), local anesthesia for 4 patients (4.4%). Surgical methods: Conventional PTFE patch in 53 patients (59.6%), eversion carotid endarterectomy was performed in 36 patients (40.4%). Postoperative results: 1 patient (1.1%) died due to bleeding, 1 patient (1.1%) had cerebral infarction after 6.97 ± 3.9 days. Mean medium-term follow-up: 23.74 months. There was 1 patient died due to late surgical bleeding after 2 months, 0 patients had recurrent cerebral infarction on the same side, 6 patients died from all causes (6.7%).

Conclusion: Carotid endarterectomy is a safe and effective method for stroke prevention. This method can be effectively deployed in provincial hospitals.

References

1.
Benjamin, E.J., et al., Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation, 2017. 135(10): p. e146-e603.
2.
Ko, Y., et al., MRI-based Algorithm for Acute Ischemic Stroke Subtype Classification. J Stroke, 2014. 16(3): p. 161-72.
3.
Lee, B.I., et al., Yonsei Stroke Registry. Analysis of 1,000 patients with acute cerebral infarctions. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2001. 12(3): p. 145-51.
4.
Bonati, L.H., et al., European Stroke Organisation guideline on endarterectomy and stenting for carotid artery stenosis. Eur Stroke J, 2021. 6(2): p. I-xlvii.
5.
RICOTTA, J.J., M.H. CHARLTON, and J.A. DEWEESE, Determining Criteria for Shunt Placement During Carotid Endarterectomy: EEG versus Back Pressure. 1983. 198(5): p. 642-645.
6.
Johnson, C.O., et al., Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet Neurology, 2019. 18(5): p. 439-458.
7.
Moresoli, P., et al., Carotid Stenting Versus Endarterectomy for Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Stroke, 2017. 48(8): p. 2150-2157.
8.
Mas, J.L., et al., Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med, 2006. 355(16): p. 1660-71.
9.
Ringleb, P.A., et al., 30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet, 2006. 368(9543): p. 1239-47.
10.
Paraskevas, K.I., et al., Editor's Choice - An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes Following Eversion vs. Conventional Carotid Endarterectomy in Randomised Controlled Trials and Observational Studies. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2018. 55(4): p. 465-473.
11.
Aburahma, A.F., A.Y. Mousa, and P.A. Stone, Shunting during carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg, 2011. 54(5): p. 1502-10.
12.
Baracchini, C., et al., Gender-based outcomes after eversion carotid endarterectomy from 1998 to 2009. J Vasc Surg, 2012. 55(2): p. 338-45.
13.
Schneider, J.R., et al., A comparison of results with eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy from the Vascular Quality Initiative and the Mid-America Vascular Study Group. J Vasc Surg, 2015. 61(5): p. 1216-22.

Files

Article Views71
Document Views0
Downloads0
Section NGHIÊN CỨU LÂM SÀNG