Tóm tắt
Nghiên cứu ứng dụng kỹ thuật đo áp lực trong lòng động mạch vành và dự trữ dòng chảy mạch vành bằng dây dẫn áp lực (Pressure Wire)
Trang chủ
NGHIÊN CỨU LÂM SÀNG
Số phát hành:
Nghiên cứu ứng dụng kỹ thuật đo áp lực trong lòng động mạch vành và dự trữ dòng chảy mạch vành bằng dây dẫn áp lực (Pressure Wire)
Phạm Mạnh Hùng: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam - Bệnh viện Bạch Mai;
Nguyễn Ngọc Quang: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam - Bệnh viện Bạch Mai;
Đinh Huỳnh Linh: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam - Bệnh viện Bạch Mai;
Phạm Nhật Minh: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam - Bệnh viện Bạch Mai;
Xuất bản: tháng 11 1, 2014
Views: 2
Tài liệu tham khảo
1.
1. Nico H.J. Pijls, J.A.M., Bernard De Bruyne, Experimental Basis of Determining Maximum Coronary, Myocardial, and Collateral Blood Flow by Pressure Measurements for Assessing Functional Stenosis Severit Before and After Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty. Circulation, 1993. 86: p. 1354-1367.
2.
2. Pijls, N.H. and B. De Bruyne, Coronary pressure measurement and fractional flow reserve. Heart, 1998. 80(6): p. 539-42.
3.
3. Fischer, J.J., et al., Comparison between visual assessment and quantitative angiography versus fractional flow reserve for native coronary narrowings of moderate severity. Am J Cardiol, 2002. 90(3): p. 210-5.
4.
4. Kristensen, T.S., et al., Correlation between coronary computed tomographic angiography and fractional flow reserve. Int J Cardiol, 2010. 144(2): p. 200-5.
5.
5. Arnold, J.R., et al., Adenosine stress myocardial contrast echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparison with coronary angiography and cardiac magnetic resonance. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2010. 3(9): p. 934-43.
6.
6. Koo, B.K., et al., Physiologic assessment of jailed side branch lesions using fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005. 46(4): p. 633-7.
7.
7. Yong, A.S., et al., Three-dimensional and two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography, and their prediction of reduced fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J, 2010.
8.
8. Hamilos, M., et al., Fractional flow reserve: an indispensable diagnostic tool in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory. Hellenic J Cardiol, 2010. 51(2): p. 133-41.
9.
9. Christou, M.A., et al., Meta-analysis of fractional flow reserve versus quantitative coronary angiography and noninvasive imaging for evaluation of myocardial ischemia. Am J Cardiol, 2007. 99(4): p. 450-6.
10.
10. White, C., Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiological importance of a coronary stenosis? N Engl J Med, 1984(310): p. 819.
11.
11. Madersbacher, S. and A. Ponholzer, Re: Fleur I. de Korte, Jochem W. van Werkum, Peter L.M. Vijverberg, Jurrien M. ten Berg. Late coronary stent thrombosis complicating urologic surgery. Eur Urol 2008;54:221-5. Eur Urol, 2009. 55(1): p. e27-8.
12.
12. Pijls, N.H., et al., Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med, 1996. 334(26): p. 1703-8.
13.
13. Tonino, P.A., et al., Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention.
14.
N Engl J Med, 2009. 360(3): p. 213-24.
15.
14. Pijls, N.H., et al., Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007. 49(21): p. 2105-11.
16.
15. Fischer, J.J., et al., Outcome of patients with acute coronary syndromes and moderate coronary lesions undergoing deferral of revascularization based on fractional flow reserve assessment. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2006. 68(4): p. 544-8.
17.
16. De Bruyne, B. and J. Sarma, Fractional flow reserve: a review: invasive imaging. Heart, 2008. 94(7): p. 949-59.
18.
17. Tonino, P.A., et al., Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2010. 55(25): p. 2816- 21.
19.
18. Pijls, N.H., et al., Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2010. 56(3): p. 177-84.
20.
19. Wongpraparut, N., et al., Thirty-month outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided versus conventional multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol, 2005. 96(7): p. 877-84.
21.
20. Hachamovitch, R., et al., Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation, 2003. 107(23): p. 2900-7.
22.
21. Shaw, L.J., et al., Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation, 2008. 117(10): p. 1283-91.