Tạp chí Tim mạch học Việt Nam

Article detail

Article detail description

Home
CA LÂM SÀNG Issue: Số 121 - 2026 TIM MẠCH CAN THIỆP

The Role of Combined Plaque Modification Strategies in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Severe Coronary Calcification: A Case-Based Discussion

Phạm Mạnh Hùng: Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội; Dương Hồng Niên: Bệnh viện 19 - 8, Bộ Công an; Bùi Thành Đạt: Viện Tim mạch, Bệnh viện 19-8, Bộ Công an; Phạm Nhật Minh: Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội; Phan Đình Nghĩa: Viện Tim mạch, Bệnh viện 19-8, Bộ Công an; Lê Văn Đạt: Viện Tim mạch, Bệnh viện 19-8, Bộ Công an;
Published: May 30, 2026
Views: 115

Abstract

Background: Severe coronary artery calcification (SCAC) remains one of the most challenging lesion subsets in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), affecting approximately 20–30% of patients undergoing coronary revascularization. SCAC is associated with an increased risk of stent underexpansion, stent thrombosis, and in-stent restenosis. Various calcium-modification techniques have been developed, including rotational/orbital atherectomy (RA/OA), intravascular lithotripsy (IVL), and cutting/scoring balloons. More recently, the combined RA + IVL strategy has gained recognition following the publication of the DUAL-PREP trial (2025). Case Presentation: A 78-year-old man with a history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, previous myocardial infarction treated with left anterior descending artery (LAD) stenting in 2016, and heart failure with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 45% presented with exertional angina. Coronary angiography revealed a severely calcified 95% stenosis in the proximal-to-mid right coronary artery (RCA), characterized by marked vessel tortuosity, circumferential 360° calcium, and the presence of calcific nodules. PCI was successfully performed using a combined lesion-preparation strategy consisting of rotational atherectomy (RotaPro) followed by intravascular lithotripsy with a 3.0 × 15 mm IVL balloon under continuous intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance. The final result demonstrated optimal stent expansion, symmetric stent geometry, and complete stent apposition. Discussion: This case illustrates a stepwise RA-to-IVL strategy based on the updated 2025 device-selection algorithm for heavily calcified coronary lesions. Rotational atherectomy effectively modifies superficial calcium and facilitates device delivery, whereas IVL further fractures deep calcium deposits and residual calcific nodules. The DUAL-PREP study (118 patients from 20 centers in Japan) confirmed the safety and efficacy of this combined approach, reporting a 30-day major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) rate of 1.7% and a procedural success rate of 98.3%. These findings have contributed to a shift in clinical recommendations from a “relative contraindication” to a “conditional recommendation” for IVL use following RA when the residual calcium burden remains significant (OCT calcium score ≥ 3).

Keywords
Severe coronary artery calcification rotational atherectomy RotaPro intravascular lithotripsy Shockwave combined RA+IVL DUAL-PREP calcific nodule IVUS lesion preparation

References

1.
Geva T, Martins JD, Wald RM. Atrial septal defects. Lancet. 2014;383(9932):1921-1932. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62145-5.
2.
Berger F, Vogel M, Kramer A, et al. Incidence of atrial flutter/fibrillation in adults with atrial septal defect before and after catheter closure or surgical repair. Am J Cardiol. 1999;83(2):231-233. doi:10.1016/S0002-9149(98)00838-0.
3.
Lam YY, Li X, Yip GWK, et al. Long-term improvements in atrial remodeling and pulmonary arterial pressure after percutaneous closure of atrial septal defect in adults. Am J Cardiol. 2004;93(4):506-509. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.10.043.
4.
Yalonetsky S, Lorber A. Comparative changes in pulmonary artery pressure and vascular resistance after transcatheter atrial septal defect closure. Congenit Heart Dis. 2009;4(1):28-31. doi:10.1111/j.1747-0803.2008.00253.x.
5.
Spies C, Khandelwal A, Timmermanns I, et al. Incidence of atrial fibrillation following transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects in adults. Am J Cardiol. 2008;102(7):902-906. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.05.043.
6.
Chen SA, Tai CT. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation originating from the non-pulmonary vein foci. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005;16(2):229-232. doi:10.1046/j.1540-8167.2005.50038.x.
7.
Masura J, Gavora P, Podnar T. Long-term outcome of transcatheter secundum-type atrial septal defect closure using Amplatzer septal occluders. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45(4):505-507. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.10.064.
8.
Wylie JV Jr, Vaidya VR, Kapa S, et al. Relationship between left atrial size and outcomes of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015;42(1):37-44. doi:10.1007/s10840-014-9958-8.
9.
Santangeli P, Di Biase L, Burkhardt JD, et al. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with atrial septal defect: clinical insights from a multicenter study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4(4):480-486. doi:10.1161/CIRCEP.111.962514.
10.
Zhao Y, Zhao Q, Yao Y, et al. Combined catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation and interventional closure of atrial septal defect: a single-center experience. Int J Cardiol. 2017;242:226-230. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.03.132.
11.
Aly MF, Tang M, Tin AS, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation and atrial septal defect closure in adults: when is the right time? Heart Rhythm. 2009;6(1):76-82. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.09.016.
12.
Oral H, Pappone C, Chugh A, et al. Circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation for chronic atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(9):934-941. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa050955.
13.
Vogel M, Berger F, Kramer A, et al. Incidence of secondary pulmonary hypertension in adults with atrial septal or sinus venosus defects. Heart. 1999;82(1):30-33. doi:10.1136/hrt.82.1.30.
14.
Rao PS. Percutaneous closure of atrial septal defects with deficient or absent rims. J Interv Cardiol. 2009;22(4):386-393. doi:10.1111/j.1540-8183.2009.00481.x.
15.
Du ZD, Koenig P, Hijazi ZM, et al. Comparison of transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defect using the Amplatzer septal occluder associated with deficient versus sufficient rims. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90(8):865-869. doi:10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02658-1.
16.
Cao QL, Du ZD, Koenig P, et al. Speed of normalization of right ventricular volume overload after transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect in children and adults. Am J Cardiol. 2001;88(12):1450-1453. doi:10.1016/S0002-9149(01)02173-5.
17.
Crawford GB, Brindis RG, Krucoff MW, et al. Percutaneous atrial septal occluder devices and cardiac erosion: a review of the literature. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;80(2):157-167. doi:10.1002/ccd.23346.
18.
Butera G, De Rosa G, Chessa M, et al. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect in young children: results and follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42(2):241-245. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00584-6.
19.
Amin Z, Hijazi ZM, Bass JL, et al. Erosion of Amplatzer septal occluder device after closure of secundum atrial septal defects: review of registry of complications and recommendations to minimize future risk. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004;63(4):496-502. doi:10.1002/ccd.20211.
20.
Rillig A, Meyborg M, Hansel J, et al. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with atrial septal defects closed with interventional techniques. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012;33(3):265-270. doi:10.1007/s10840-011-9632-1.
The Role of Combined Plaque Modification Strategies in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Severe Coronary Calcification: A Case-Based Discussion

Files

Article Views115
Document Views7
Downloads0
Section CA LÂM SÀNG
Category TIM MẠCH CAN THIỆP
Pages 147-155
Copyright Holder 2026 Tạp chí Tim mạch học Việt Nam