Tạp chí Tim mạch học Việt Nam

Article detail

Article detail description

Home
NGHIÊN CỨU LÂM SÀNG Issue: Số 103, 2022 TIM MẠCH CAN THIỆP

Initial assessment of the role of intra-aortic balloon pump during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention

Nguyen Trung Hau: Vietnam National Heart Institute; Phạm Mạnh Hùng: Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội; Võ Duy Văn: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam, Bệnh viện Bạch Mai; Văn Đức Hạnh: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam, Bệnh viện Bạch Mai; Nguyễn Quang Kha: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam - Bệnh viện Bạch Mai; Nguyễn Mạch Hoạt: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam, Bệnh viện Bạch Mai; Đỗ Đức Tuân: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam, Bệnh viện Bạch Mai;
Published: December 1, 2022
Views: 8

Abstract

Background: Intervention in high-risk patients with coronary artery disease has a low success rate and higher risk of complications. The intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is a recommended hemodynamic support device used in this patient population. However, there are still various opinions regarding the use of IABP. Objective: (1) To describe clinical and subclinical characteristics of patients with high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), (2) Evaluate the role of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) during high-risk PCI. Materials and method: From August 2020 to October 2021, we conducted the study on 36 patient with high-risk coronary diseases in whom PCI, Among them, 16 patients underwent intervention under hemodynamic support of IABP. Results: Thirty six patients (male 66,7%) join in the study (mean age 71,81±8,52 years). Common cardiovascular risk factors were hypertention (63,9%), smoking (47,2%) and diabetes (33,3%). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 34±9,71%. The mean SYNTAX score was 27,39±2,96. There were no significant differences in clinical and and subclinical characteristics between the group using and not using IABP during the intervention. In IABP group, the mean blood pressure after IABP support was significantly higher than baseline (88,31±7,39 mmHg vs 77,67±7,2 mmHg, p=0,001), the mean heart rate after IABP support was significantly lower than baseline (80,75±9,84 vs 83,93±12,66, p=0,007). The group supported by IABP had a higher rate of not using vasopressors, and the rate of using 1 vasopressor drug was less than the group without IABP support, statistically significant with p<0.05. Conclusion: IABP can be use to support for high-risk PCI. Use of IABP reduces the proportion of patients requiring additional vasopressors to maintain hemodynamics.

Keywords
high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention intra-aortic balloon pump hemodynamic support

References

1.
Rihal CS, Naidu SS, Givertz MM, Szeto WY, Burke JA, Kapur NK, et al. 2015 SCAI/ACC/HFSA/STS Clinical Expert Consensus Statement on the Use of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiovascular Care: Endorsed by the American Heart Assocation, the Cardiological Society of India, and Sociedad Latino Americana de Cardiologia Intervencion; Affirmation of Value by the Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology-Association Canadienne de Cardiologie d’intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 May 19;65(19):e7–26.
2.
Perera D, Stables R, Thomas M, Booth J, Pitt M, Blackman D, et al. Elective intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010 Aug 25;304(8):867–74.
3.
Briguori C, Sarais C, Pagnotta P, Airoldi F, Liistro F, Sgura F, et al. Elective versus provisional intra-aortic balloon pumping in high-risk percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J. 2003 Apr;145(4):700–7.
4.
Mishra S, Chu WW, Torguson R, Wolfram R, Deible R, Suddath WO, et al. Role of prophylactic intra-aortic balloon pump in high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2006 Sep 1;98(5):608–12.
5.
Pan W-H, Yeh W-T. How to define obesity? Evidence-based multiple action points for public awareness, screening, and treatment: an extension of Asian-Pacific recommendations. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2008;17(3):370–4.
6.
Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr Off Publ Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28(1):1-39.e14. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003
7.
Mamas MA, Anderson SG, O’Kane PD, et al. Impact of left ventricular function in relation to procedural outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(43):3004-3012a. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu303
8.
Mohr FW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 2013;381(9867):629-638. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60141-5
9.
Akyurekli Y, Taichman GC, Keon WJ. Effectiveness of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation on systolic unloading. Can J Surg J Can Chir. 1980;23(2):122-126.
10.
Trần Duy Anh, Nguyễn Thị Quý. Tổng quan về bóng đối xung nội động mạch chủ. Y học thực hành (835-836). 2012.
Initial assessment of the role of intra-aortic balloon pump during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention

Files

Article Views8
Document Views0
Downloads0
Section NGHIÊN CỨU LÂM SÀNG
Category TIM MẠCH CAN THIỆP
Pages 16-25
Copyright Holder 2022 Tạp chí Tim mạch học Việt Nam