Tạp chí Tim mạch học Việt Nam

Article detail

Article detail description

Home
BÀI TỔNG QUAN. Issue: Số 118 BỆNH MẠCH VÀNH

From Anatomy to Physiology: Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction and the Emerging Role of Invasive Functional Testing in Vietnam

Martinez Benitez Piter Martinez Benitez: Hung Vuong General Hospital; Van Duc Hanh: Vietnam National Heart Institute, Bach Mai Hospital; Yanitsy Chipi Rodriguez: Hung Vuong General Hospital;
Published: November 28, 2025
Views: 69

Abstract

Up to 40% of patients evaluated for angina/ischemia have non-obstructive coronary arteries, referred to as ANOCA when angina is the presenting symptom and INOCA when objective ischemia is documented. The 2024 ESC Chronic Coronary Syndromes guideline introduces a Class I, Level B recommendation for performing invasive coronary angiography when invasive functional assessments are available to confirm or exclude obstructive coronary artery disease or ANOCA/INOCA, even if non-invasive testing yields an uncertain diagnosis. Despite the absence of epicardial stenosis, these patients frequently suffer from recurrent angina, reduced quality of life, and excess cardiovascular risk. Coronary microvascular dysfunction and vasospastic angina are the two dominant endotypes. A comprehensive invasive coronary function testing protocol, combining fractional flow reserve or instantaneous wave-free ratio with coronary flow reserve, the index of microcirculatory resistance (bolus thermodilution), and the emerging minimal microvascular resistance (continuous thermodilution), allowing for detailed physiological characterization. This expanded diagnostic framework enables the subclassification of coronary microvascular dysfunction into structural and functional endotypes, thereby facilitating personalized therapy and enhancing prognostic accuracy. Acetylcholine provocation further identifies endothelial or vasospastic components, completing a precision endotyping approach that guides risk-stratified therapy.

This narrative review synthesizes global evidence and provides a pragmatic roadmap relevant to health systems such as Vietnam’s, where anatomical strategies still predominate. We summarize epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnostic algorithms, therapeutic implications, and research priorities, highlighting future directions and collaborative opportunities to responsibly expand access to invasive coronary physiology while maintaining patient safety and scientific rigor.

References

1.
References:
2.
Beltrame JF, Crea F, Kaski JC, et al. International standardization of diagnostic criteria for vasospastic angina. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(33):2565-2568. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv351
3.
Jespersen L, Hvelplund A, Abildstrøm SZ, et al. Stable angina pectoris with no obstructive coronary artery disease is associated with increased risks of major adverse cardiovascular events. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(6):734-744. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehr331
4.
Kunadian V, Chieffo A, Camici PG, et al. An EAPCI Expert Consensus Document on Ischaemia with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries in Collaboration with European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Coronary Pathophysiology & Microcirculation Endorsed by Coronary Vasomotor Disorders International Study Group. EuroIntervention. 021;16(13):1049-1069. doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa503
5.
Taqueti VR, Di Carli MF. Coronary Microvascular Disease Pathogenic Mechanisms and Therapeutic Options: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(21):2625-2641. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.042
6.
Vrints C, Andreotti F, Koskinas KC, et al. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2024;45(36):3415-3537. doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae177
7.
Murthy VL, Naya M, Foster CR, et al. Association between coronary vascular dysfunction and cardiac mortality in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2012;126(15):1858-1868. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.120402
8.
Konst RE, Damman P, Pellegrini D, et al. Vasomotor dysfunction in patients with angina and nonobstructive coronary artery disease is dominated by vasospasm. Int J Cardiol . 2021; 333:14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.02.079
9.
Pepine CJ, Anderson RD, Sharaf BL, et al. Coronary microvascular reactivity to adenosine predicts adverse outcome in women evaluated for suspected ischemia, as reported in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute WISE (Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(25):2825-2832.
10.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.01.054.
11.
Ford TJ, Berry C. How to Diagnose and Manage Angina Without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Lessons from the British Heart Foundation CorMicA Trial. Interv Cardiol. 2019;14(2):76-82. Published 2019 May 21. doi:10.15420/icr.2019.04. R1.
12.
Johnson NP, Kirkeeide RL, Gould KL. Coronary anatomy to predict physiology: fundamental limits. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6(5):817-832. doi:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.000373.
13.
Crea F, Camici PG, Bairey Merz CN. Coronary microvascular dysfunction: an update. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(17):1101-1111. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht513
14.
Bairey Merz CN, Pepine CJ, Walsh MN, Fleg JL. Ischemia and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease (INOCA): Developing Evidence-Based Therapies and Research Agenda for the Next Decade. Circulation. 2017;135(11):1075-1092. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024534.
15.
Camici PG, Crea F. Coronary microvascular dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(8):830-840. doi:10.1056/NEJMra061889.
16.
Savulescu-Fiedler I, Baz RO, Baz RA, Scheau C, Gegiu A. Coronary Artery Spasm: From Physiopathology to Diagnosis. Life. 2025; 15(4):597. doi.org/10.3390/life15040597
17.
Steinberg RR, Dragan A, Mehta PK, Toleva O. Coronary microvascular disease in women: epidemiology, mechanisms, evaluation, and treatment. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2024;102(10):594-606. doi:10.1139/cjpp-2023-0414.
18.
Ciaramella L, Di Serafino L, Mitrano L, et al. Invasive Assessment of Coronary Microcirculation: A State-of-the-Art Review. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;14(1):86. Published 2023 Dec 30. doi:10.3390/diagnostics14010086.
19.
Rahman H, Ryan M, Lumley M, et al. Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction Is Associated With Myocardial Ischemia and Abnormal Coronary Perfusion During Exercise. Circulation. 2019;140(22):1805-1816. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.041595.
20.
Shimokawa H, Suda A, Takahashi J, et al. Clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with microvascular angina: an international and prospective cohort study by the Coronary Vasomotor Disorders International Study (COVADIS) Group. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(44):4592-4600. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab282.
21.
Gori T, Münzel T. Oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction: therapeutic implications. Ann Med. 2011;43(4):259-272. doi:10.3109/07853890.2010.54392020.
22.
Mehta PK, Wei J, Wenger NK. Ischemia in women: evolving knowledge. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(11):1231–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.098
23.
Crea F, Montone RA, Rinaldi R. Pathophysiology of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction. Circ J. 2022;86(9):1319-1328. doi:10.1253/circj.CJ-21-084822.
24.
Bilak JM, Alam U, Miller CA, McCann GP, Arnold JR, Kanagala P. Microvascular Dysfunction in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Pathophysiology, Assessment, Prevalence and Prognosis. Card Fail Rev. 2022;8:e24. Published 2022 Jul 1. doi:10.15420/cfr. 2022.1223.
25.
Bairey Merz CN, Handberg EM, Shufelt CL, et al. The WISE studies: design and key insights. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(15):190–202.
26.
Ong P, Camici PG, Beltrame JF, et al. International standardization of diagnostic criteria for microvascular angina. Int J Cardiol. 2018; 250:16-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.08.068.
27.
Green, R., Cantoni, V., Acampa, W. et al. Prognostic value of coronary flow reserve in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease referred to PET myocardial perfusion imaging: A meta-analysis. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 28, 904–918 (2021). doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-02000-7
28.
Ong P, Athanasiadis A, Borgulya G, Mahrholdt H, Kaski JC, Sechtem U. High prevalence of a pathological response to acetylcholine testing in patients with stable angina pectoris and unobstructed coronary arteries. The ACOVA Study (Abnormal Coronary Vasomotion in patients with stable angina and unobstructed coronary arteries). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(7):655-662. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.015
29.
Gould KL, Johnson NP. Coronary Physiology Beyond Coronary Flow Reserve in Microvascular Angina: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(21):2642-2662. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.106
30.
Mangiacapra F, Viscusi MM, Verolino G, et al. Invasive Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Function. J Clin Med. 2021;11(1):228. Published 2021 Dec 31. doi:10.3390/jcm11010228
31.
Aziz A, Hansen HS, Sechtem U, Prescott E, Ong P. Sex-Related Differences in Vasomotor Function in Patients with Angina and Unobstructed Coronary Arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(19):2349-2358. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.016
32.
Hao K, Takahashi J, Kikuchi Y, et al. Prognostic Impacts of Comorbid Significant Coronary Stenosis and Coronary Artery Spasm in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease. J Am Heart Assoc. Published online January 16, 2021. doi:10.1161/JAHA.120.017831
33.
Hoshino M, Jukema RA, Pijls N, et al. Microvascular resistance reserve before and after PCI: A serial FFR and [15O] H2O PET study. Atherosclerosis. 2024; 395:117555. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2024.117555
34.
Kothawade K, Bairey Merz CN. Microvascular coronary dysfunction in women: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2011;36(8):291-318. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2011.05.002.
35.
Modi BN, Rahman H, Ryan M, et al. Comparison of fractional flow reserve, instantaneous wave-free ratio, and a novel technique for assessing coronary arteries with serial lesions. EuroIntervention. 2020;16(7):577-583. doi:10.4244/EIJ-D-19-0063533.
36.
Lee JM, Lee SH, Hwang D, et al. Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Nonhyperemic Pressure Ratios: Resting Full-Cycle Ratio, Diastolic Pressure Ratio, and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(18):e016818. doi:10.1161/JAHA.120.016818
37.
Namba HF, Boerhout CKM, Damman P, et al. Invasive coronary function testing in clinical practice: Implementing the 2024 ESC guidelines on chronic coronary syndromes. Int J Cardiol. 2025; 430:133176. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133176
38.
Rahman H, Demir OM, Ryan M, et al. Optimal Use of Vasodilators for Diagnosis of Microvascular Angina in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(6): e009019. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009019
39.
Fearon, W, Dash, R. Index of Microcirculatory Resistance and Infarct Size. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2019 May, 12 (5) 849–851. doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.04.004
40.
Ong P, Athanasiadis A, Borgulya G, Voehringer M, Sechtem U. 3-year follow-up of patients with coronary artery spasm as cause of acute coronary syndrome: the CASPAR (coronary artery spasm in patients with acute coronary syndrome) study follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(2):147-152. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.08.626
41.
Ford TJ, Stanley B, Good R, et al. Stratified Medical Therapy Using Invasive Coronary Function Testing in Angina: The CorMicA Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(23 Pt A):2841-2855. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.006
42.
Sueda S, Kohno H, Ochi T, Uraoka T. Overview of the Acetylcholine Spasm Provocation Test. Clin Cardiol. 2015;38(7):430-438. doi:10.1002/clc. 22403
43.
Fearon WF, Kobayashi Y. Invasive Assessment of the Coronary Microvasculature: The Index of Microcirculatory Resistance. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(12): e005361. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005361

Files

Article Views69
Document Views1
Downloads0
Section BÀI TỔNG QUAN.
Issue Số 118
Category BỆNH MẠCH VÀNH
Pages 10-24