Tạp chí Tim mạch học Việt Nam

Article detail

Article detail description

Home
NGHIÊN CỨU LÂM SÀNG Issue: Số 117

Results of Fractional Flow Reserve measurement in patients with chronic coronary syndrome at Huu Nghi Hospital

Bùi Long: Bệnh viện Hữu Nghị;
Published: September 30, 2025
Views: 74

Abstract

Introduction: Deciding whether to treat coronary lesions in patients with chronic coronary syndrome can be challenging for interventional cardiologists. Traditional angiography-based diagnosis can lead to unnecessary intervention. Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) measurement helps accurately assess the impact of the lesion in term of hemodynamic factor, leading to an appropriate decision of intervention.

Objective: To study the the outcomes of FFR-guided coronary intervention.

Methods: Cross-sectional descriptive study.

Results: With 50 lesions in 43 patients, there was a mismatch between morphological and functional stenosis in 30% of the lesions. Specifically, 10% of the lesions were morphologically severe but had an FFR > 0,8, while 20% were morphologically moderate but had an FFR ≤ 0,8. FFR helped prevent missing intervention for 27,78% of lesions that were morphologically moderate but functionally significant. FFR also helped avoid unnecessary intervention for 35,72% of morphologically severe lesions that were not functionally significant.

Conclusion: The use of FFR in clinical practice optimizes treatment decisions, ensuring that interventions are performed only when truly necessary, thereby improving treatment effectiveness and minimizing risks for patients.

References

1.
Quang NDD. Study on the outcomes of FFR-guided percutaneous coronary intervention. Hue Journal of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy. 2018
2.
Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(3):213-224. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0807611
3.
Zimmermann FM, Ferrara A, Johnson NP, et al. Deferral vs. performance of percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally non-significant coronary stenosis: 15-year follow-up of the DEFER trial. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(45):3182-3188. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv452
4.
Hamilos M, Peace A, Kochiadakis G, et al. Fractional flow reserve: an indispensable diagnostic tool in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2010;51(2):133-141.
5.
Yong AS, Ng AC, Brieger D, Lowe HC, Ng MK, Kritharides L. Three-dimensional and two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography, and their prediction of reduced fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(3):345-353. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehq259
6.
Koo BK, Kang HJ, Youn TJ, et al. Physiologic assessment of jailed side branch lesions using fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(4):633-637. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.054
7.
Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Cohen I, Berman DS. Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation. 2003;107(23):2900-2907. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000072790.23090.41
8.
Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Maron DJ, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation. 2008;117(10):1283-1291. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.743963
9.
De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(11):991-1001. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1205361
10.
Pham MH, Nguyen NQ. Study on the application of intracoronary pressure measurement and coronary flow reserve using a pressure guidewire. Journal of Vietnamese Cardiology. 2014

Files

Article Views74
Document Views0
Downloads0
Section NGHIÊN CỨU LÂM SÀNG
Issue Số 117
Pages 128-139