Tạp chí Tim mạch học Việt Nam

Article detail

Article detail description

Home
NGHIÊN CỨU LÂM SÀNG Issue: Số 115 BỆNH RỐI LOẠN NHỊP TIM

Optimal permanent pacemaker programming for right ventricular pacing in patiens with sinus node dysfunction

Ngô Viết Lâm: Bệnh viện Trường Đại học Y Dược Huế; Hoàng Anh Tiến: Trường Đại học Y Dược, Đại học Huế; Huỳnh Văn Minh: Trường Đại học Y Dược, Đại học Huế; Đoàn Khánh Hùng: Bệnh viện Trường Đại học Y Dược Huế; Nguyễn Vũ Phòng: Bệnh viện Trường Đại học Y Dược Huế; Dương Minh Quý: Bệnh viện Trường Đại học Y Dược Huế; Phạm Tuấn Hiệp: Bệnh viện Trường Đại học Y Dược Huế; Nguyễn Xuân Hưng: Bệnh viện Trường Đại học Y Dược Huế;
Published: June 30, 2025
Views: 60

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the results of programming parameters to optimize right ventricular (RV) pacing in patients with sinus node dysfunction received pacemaker implantation. Methods: We analysed 40 patients with sinus node dysfunction received permanent pacemaker implantation (both single- and dual-chamber) according to the recommendations of ACC/AHA/HRS and ESC. All patients were followed up and programmed pacemakers at the hospital and 3 months after implantation. Results: The mean age was 63.2 ± 13.8. Male gender was 60%. Sinus bradycardia accounted for 45.0%, sinus arrest and/or sinoatrial block was 32.5% and tachycardia - bradycardia syndrome was 22.5%. DDD and DDDR modes accounted for 15.0% and 37.5%, respectively. Programming parameters for RV pacing otimization included: basic rate/night rate, hysteresis, capture control; and on dual-chamber pacemakers included: AV delay, AV hysteresis mode. There was a significant change in ventricular pacing percentage (Vp %), ventricular pulse amplitude (V), and calculated ERI (month) (p < 0.001). Complications of permanent pacemaker implantation were uncommon; Atrial high rate episodes (AHRE) recorded by dual chamber pacemakers accounted for 23.8%. Conclusions: Optimal programming for RV pacing is valuable in minimize unnecessary RV pacing, thereby prolonging the pacemake calculated ERI and avoiding the detrimental cardiovascular outcomes of chronic RV apical pacing.

References

1.
Ellenbogen KA, Wilkoff BL, Kay GN, et al. Clinical cardiac pacing, Defibrilation, and resynchronization therapy, 5ed; Elsevier. 2017. 375-398.
2.
Huynh TC, Pham MT. Status of permanent pacemaker implant program at Kien Giang Provincial General Hospital. Ho Chi Minh City Journal of Medicine. 2011. 15(4):130.
3.
Le VD, Le CH, Pham HD, et al. Evaluating the efficiency of two-chamber implantation of a permanent pacemaker at Ha Tinh Polyclinical Hospital. Vietnam Medical Journal. 2021. 506(1): 15-18.
4.
Huynh VM, Hoang AT, Doan KH, et al. Application of permanent pacemakers and optimal programmation in Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital. Journal of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy. 2018. 8(3):114-121. doi:10.34071/jmp.2018.3.18
5.
Nguyen TT, Huynh VM. A study on the clinical and paraclinical characteristics and the role of dual-chamber pacemakers in the treatment of bradyarrhythmias at Cho Ray Hospital. Ho Chi Minh City Journal of Medicine. 2014. 18(2): 168-174.
6.
Dinh DT, Tran VQ, Vuong VP, et al. Evaluation of early results of patients with permanent peacemakers implantation at Bai Chay Hospital from 2016 to 2020. The Vietnamese Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery. 2021. 48-55.
7.
Gillis AM. Optimal pacing for right ventricular and biventricular devices: minimizing, maximizing, and right ventricular/left ventricular site considerations. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7(5):968-977. doi:10.1161/CIRCEP.114.001360
8.
Mond HG. Electrocardiographic interpretation of pacemaker algorithms enabling minimal ventricular pacing. Heart Rhythm. 2020;17(10):1784-1792. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.05.012
9.
Paton MF, Witte KK. Heart failure and right ventricular pacing - how to avoid the need for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019;16(1):35-43. doi:10.1080/17434440.2019.1552133
10.
Sweeney MO, Bank AJ, Nsah E, et al. Minimizing ventricular pacing to reduce atrial fibrillation in sinus-node disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(10):1000-1008. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa071880
11.
Michowitz Y, Kronborg MB, Glikson M, Nielsen JC. The '10 commandments' for the 2021 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(42):4295. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab699
12.
Kusumoto FM, Schoenfeld MH, Barrett C, et al. 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2019;140(8):e382-e482. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000628
13.
Tse HF, Yu C, Wong KK, et al. Functional abnormalities in patients with permanent right ventricular pacing: the effect of sites of electrical stimulation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40(8):1451-1458. doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02169-1
14.
Calvi V, Pisanò EC, Brieda M, et al. Atrioventricular Interval Extension Is Highly Efficient in Preventing Unnecessary Right Ventricular Pacing in Sinus Node Disease: A Randomized Cross-Over Study Versus Dual- to Atrial Single-Chamber Mode Switch. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;3(5):482-490. doi:10.1016/j.jacep.2016.11.011
15.
Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. Corrigendum to: 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(40):4194. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab648

Files

Article Views60
Document Views1
Downloads0
Section NGHIÊN CỨU LÂM SÀNG
Issue Số 115
Category BỆNH RỐI LOẠN NHỊP TIM
Pages 25-34
Copyright Holder 2025 Journal of Vietnamese Cardiology