Tạp chí Tim mạch học Việt Nam

Article detail

Article detail description

Home
NGHIÊN CỨU LÂM SÀNG Issue: Số 112 BỆNH MẠCH VÀNH

No translate

Published: September 3, 2026
Views: 652

Abstract

No translate

Keywords
Cardiogenic shock SCAI classification acute myocardial infarction mortality rate prognosis

References

1.
Vahdatpour C, Collins D, Goldberg S. Cardiogenic Shock. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(8):e011991. doi:10.1161/JAHA.119.011991
2.
Sciaccaluga C, Mandoli GE, Ghionzoli N, et al. Risk stratification in cardiogenic shock: a focus on the available evidence. Heart Fail Rev. 2022;27(4):1105-1117. doi:10.1007/s10741-021-10140-7
3.
Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, et al. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(9):625-634. doi:10.1056/NEJM199908263410901
4.
Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, et al. Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(14):1287-1296. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1208410
5.
Bauer T, Zeymer U, Hochadel M, et al. Use and outcomes of multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (from the EHS-PCI Registry). Am J Cardiol. 2012;109(7):941-946. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.11.020
6.
Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(27):2129-2200. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128
7.
Ouweneel DM, Eriksen E, Sjauw KD, et al. Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(3):278-287. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.022
8.
Thiele H, Akin I, Sandri M, et al. PCI Strategies in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(25):2419-2432. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1710261
9.
Lee JM, Rhee TM, Hahn JY, et al. Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(8):844-856. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.12.028
10.
Baran DA, Grines CL, Bailey S, et al. SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock: This document was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in April 2019. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;94(1):29-37. doi:10.1002/ccd.28329
11.
Burkhoff D, Garan AR, Kapur NK. The SCAI Cardiogenic Shock Staging System Gets Taken for a Test Drive. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(17):2129-2131. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.1020
12.
Naidu SS, Baran DA, Jentzer JC, et al. SCAI SHOCK Stage Classification Expert Consensus Update: A Review and Incorporation of Validation Studies: This statement was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP), American Heart Association (AHA), European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Association for Acute Cardiovascular Care (ACVC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT), Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in December 2021. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79(9):933-946. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2022.01.018
13.
Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). Eur Heart J. 2019;40(3):237-269. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy462
14.
Collet JP, Thiele H, Barbato E, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(14):1289-1367. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575
15.
Jentzer JC, Wiley BM, Anavekar NS, et al. Noninvasive Hemodynamic Assessment of Shock Severity and Mortality Risk Prediction in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;14(2):321-332. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.05.038
16.
Schrage B, Dabboura S, Yan I, et al. Application of the SCAI classification in a cohort of patients with cardiogenic shock. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;96(3):E213-E219. doi:10.1002/ccd.28707
17.
Thayer KL, Zweck E, Ayouty M, et al. Invasive Hemodynamic Assessment and Classification of In-Hospital Mortality Risk Among Patients With Cardiogenic Shock. Circ Heart Fail. 2020;13(9):e007099. doi:10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.007099
18.
Jentzer JC, van Diepen S, Barsness GW, et al. Cardiogenic Shock Classification to Predict Mortality in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(17):2117-2128. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.077
19.
Morici N, Frea S, Bertaina M, et al. SCAI stage reclassification at 24 h predicts outcome of cardiogenic shock: Insights from the Altshock-2 registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023;101(1):22-32. doi:10.1002/ccd.30484
20.
Baran DA, Long A, Badiye AP, et al. Prospective validation of the SCAI shock classification: Single center analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;96(7):1339-1347. doi:10.1002/ccd.29319
21.
Hanson ID, Tagami T, Mando R, et al. SCAI shock classification in acute myocardial infarction: Insights from the National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;96(6):1137-1142. doi:10.1002/ccd.29139

Tác giả

Bui Vinh Ha: Vietnam National Heart Institute; Van Duc Hanh: Vietnam National Heart Institute; Pham Manh Hung: Hanoi Medical University; Bui Thi Thanh Huyen: Hanoi Medical University; Nguyen Ngoc Quang: Hanoi Medical University;
No translate

Files

Article Views652
Document Views0
Downloads27
Section NGHIÊN CỨU LÂM SÀNG
Issue Số 112
Category BỆNH MẠCH VÀNH
Pages 80-86
Copyright Holder 2024 Tạp chí Tim mạch học Việt Nam