Tạp chí Tim mạch học Việt Nam

Article detail

Article detail description

Home
CHUYÊN MỤC ĐÀO TẠO Issue: Số 100, 2022

Article

Lê Võ Kiên: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam - Bệnh viện Bạch Mai; Trần Tuấn Việt: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam - Bệnh viện Bạch Mai; Phạm Trường Sơn: Bệnh viện Trung ương Quân đội 108; TS.Phan Đình Phong: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam - Bệnh viện Bạch Mai;
Published: April 1, 2022
Views: 118
No abstract or full text is available for this article.

References

1.
1. Anne M. Gillis, et al. (2012), “HRS/ACCF Expert Consensus Statemetn on Pacemaker Device and Mode Selection”, Heart Rhythm Society and American College of Cardiology Foundation.
2.
2. Lamas GA, Lee KL, Sweeney MO, Silverman R, Leon A, Yee R, et al. Ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing for sinus-node dysfunction. N Engl J Med. (2002) 346:1854–62.
3.
3. Wilkoff BL, Cook JR, Epstein AE, Greene HL, Hallstrom AP, Hsia H, et al. Dual - chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: the Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial. JAMA. (2002) 288:3115–23.
4.
4. Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS, Ellenbogen KA, Greenspon AJ, Freedman RA, Lee KL, et al. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction. Circulation. (2003) 107:2932– 7. 10.
5.
5. Tops LF, Schalij MJ, Bax JJ. The effects of right ventricular apical pacing on ventricular function and dys- synchrony implications for therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54:764–76.
6.
6. Tse HF, Lau CP. Long-term effect of right ventricular pacing on myocardial perfusion and function. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:744–9.
7.
7. Chen K, Li Y, Dai Y, Sun Q, Luo B, Li C, et al. Comparison of electrocardiogram characteristics and pacing parameters between left bundle branch pacing and right ventricular pacing in patients receiving pacemaker therapy. Europace. (2019) 21:673–80.
8.
8. Li Y, Chen K, Dai Y, Li C, Sun Q, Chen R, et al. Left bundle branch pacing for symptomatic bradycardia: Implant success rate, safety, and pacing characteristics. Heart Rhythm. (2019) 16:1758–65.
9.
9. Zhang W, Huang J, Qi Y, Wang F, Guo L, Shi X, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy by left bundle branch area pacing in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block. Heart Rhythm. (2019) 16:1783–90.
10.
10. Wu S, Su L, Vijayaraman P, Zheng R, Cai M, Xu L, et al. Left bundle branch pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: non-randomized on treatment comparison with His bundle pacing and biventricular pacing. Can J Cardiol. (2020) 37:319–28.
11.
11. Knorre GHV. The 100(th) anniversary of “The Conduction System of the Mammalian Heart” by Sunao Tawara. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. (2006) 17:140–5.
12.
12. Elizari MV. The normal variants in the left bundle branch system. J Electrocardiol. (2017) 50:389–99.
13.
13. Hou X, et al. Feasibility and cardiac synchrony of permanent left bundle branch pacing through the interventricular septum. Europace (2019) 21: 1694-702.
14.
14. Chen X, Wu S, Su L, Su Y, Huang W. The characteristics of the electrocardiogram and the intracardiac electrogram in left bundle branch pacing. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. (2019) 30:1096–101.
15.
15. Sundaram S, Vijayaraman P. Left bundle branch pacing. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. (2020) 31:124–34.
16.
16. Shengjie Wu et al. Left bundle branch pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: Nonrandomized on-treatment comparison with his bundle pacing and biventricular pacing. Can J Cardiol 2021 Feb; 37 (2): 319-328.
17.
17. Michael Glikson et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resychronization therapy. European Heart Journal (2021) 00, 1 – 94.

Files

Article Views118
Document Views0
Downloads0
Section CHUYÊN MỤC ĐÀO TẠO