Tạp chí Tim mạch học Việt Nam

Article detail

Article detail description

Home
NGHIÊN CỨU LÂM SÀNG Issue: Số 110 BỆNH RỐI LOẠN NHỊP TIM

Early evaluation of results of conduction pathway pacing method in patients with atrioventricular block indicated for permanent pacemaker implantation

Đặng Minh Hải: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam, Bệnh viện Bạch Mai; Trần Song Giang: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam, Bệnh viện Bạch Mai; Trịnh Văn Nhị: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam, Bệnh viện Bạch Mai; Nguyễn Hữu Tuyển: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam, Bệnh viện Bạch Mai;
Published: July 30, 2024
Views: 97

Abstract

Introduction: Conduction system pacing (CSP) includes His bundle pacing (HBP) or left branch branch area Pacing (LBBAP) is cardiac physiologic pacing. CSP has emerged as a safe and effective alternative to traditional right ventricular pacing in patients with atrioventricular block.

Objective: This study evaluates the safety, feasibility and effectiveness of CSP in patients with atrioventricular block indicated for permanent pacemaker implantation.

Methods: This is an interventional study without a control group. Patients with AV block indicated for permanent pacemaker implantation underwent His bundle pacing or left bundle branch area pacing. The safety and efficacy of CSP were assessed.

Results: CSP was performed in 43 patients with a success rate of 36/43 (83.7%), including 7/10 (70%) for HBP and 29/33 (87.7%) for LBBAP. The QRS duration at baseline was 100 ± 11 ms versus 123 ± 10.3 ms (p < 0.001) compared to 119 ± 38 ms and 122.5 ± 10 ms (P = 0.339) during HBP and LBBAP, respectively. HBP had a higher pacing threshold at implantation compared to LBBAP (1.2 ± 0.6 V/1ms vs 0.86 ± 0.3 V/0.4ms, P = 0.024), but it remained stable during follow-up. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improved from 51 ± 15.5% before implantation to 56 ± 12.6% at the end of the study (P = 0.004), with a more significant improvement in patients with heart failure before implantation. The incidence rates of lead dislodgement and pacemaker infection were 1/36 (2.7%) and 1/36 (2.7%), respectively.

Conclusion: CSP was successfully performed in 83.7% of patients with low complication rates and low pacing threshold and stable thresholds during follow-up. CSP improves LVEF, especially in patients with pre-existing heart failure.

References

1.
Wilkoff BL, Cook JR, Epstein AE, et al. Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: the Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial. JAMA. 2002;288(24):3115-3123. doi:10.1001/jama.288.24.3115
2.
Gupta A, Parakh N, Bansal R, et al. Correlation of pacing site in right ventricle with paced QRS complex duration. Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal. 2018;18(6):210-216. doi:10.1016/j.ipej.2018.08.001
3.
Vijayaraman P, Bordachar P, Ellenbogen KA. The Continued Search for Physiological Pacing: Where Are We Now? Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2017;69(25):3099-3114. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.05.005
4.
Prinzen FW, Vernooy K, Auricchio A. Cardiac resynchronization therapy: state-of-the-art of current applications, guidelines, ongoing trials, and areas of controversy. Circulation. 2013;128(22):2407-2418. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000112
5.
Hu Y, Li H, Gu M, et al. Comparison between his-bundle pacing and left bundle branch pacing in patients with atrioventricular block. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021;62(1):63-73. doi:10.1007/s10840-020-00869-w
6.
Kronborg MB, Mortensen PT, Poulsen SH, et al. His or para-His pacing preserves left ventricular function in atrioventricular block: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study. Europace. 2014;16(8):1189-1196. doi:10.1093/europace/euu011
7.
Vijayaraman P, Patel N, Colburn S, et al. His-Purkinje Conduction System Pacing in Atrioventricular Block: New Insights Into Site of Conduction Block. JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology. 2022;8(1):73-85. doi:10.1016/j.jacep.2021.07.007
8.
Li X, Li H, Ma W, et al. Permanent left bundle branch area pacing for atrioventricular block: Feasibility, safety, and acute effect. Heart Rhythm. 2019;16(12):1766-1773. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.04.043
9.
Hou X, Qian Z, Wang Y, et al. Feasibility and cardiac synchrony of permanent left bundle branch pacing through the interventricular septum. Europace. 2019;21(11):1694-1702. doi:10.1093/europace/euz188
10.
Romulo FB. Basic and Bedside Electrocardiography. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2009
11.
Zhang S, Guo J, Tao A, et al. Clinical outcomes of left bundle branch pacing compared to right ventricular apical pacing in patients with atrioventricular block. Clin Cardiol. 2021;44(4):481-487. doi:10.1002/clc.23513

Files

Article Views97
Document Views0
Downloads0
Section NGHIÊN CỨU LÂM SÀNG
Issue Số 110
Category BỆNH RỐI LOẠN NHỊP TIM