Tạp chí Tim mạch học Việt Nam

Article detail

Article detail description

Home
NGHIÊN CỨU LÂM SÀNG Issue: Số 110 BỆNH RỐI LOẠN NHỊP TIM

The current state of antithrombotic drug treatment in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Nguyễn Tiến Thành: Bệnh viện Hữu nghị Đa khoa Nghệ An; Nguyễn Quốc Thái: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam, Bệnh viện Bạch Mai; Phan Tuấn Đạt: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam, Bệnh viện Bạch Mai; Nguyễn Ngọc Quang: Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội;
Published: July 30, 2024
Views: 200

Abstract

- Background: Coronary artery disease in patients with atrial fibrillation is one of the quite complex clinical situations. The overlap between atrial fibrillation and PCI implies challenges related to the management of antithrombotic therapy.

- Objective: To study the current status of using antithrombotic therapy in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention; describe the incidence of major complications (including thrombus and bleeding) during 6 months of follow-up.

- Subjects and Methods: The study was conducted on patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention at the Vietnam National Heart Institute, Bach Mai Hospital and Nghe An Friendship General Hospital from January, 2020 to December, 2022 using a retrospective method, and a prospective study with follow-up of up to 6 months after discharge.

- Results: The study was conducted on 174 patients, with 45.4% of patients using dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT: using 1 antiplatelet agent combined with 1 anticoagulant); 54.6% of patients used triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT: using dual antiplatelet therapy combined with 1 anticoagulant). The most common antiplatelet drug was clopidogrel at 95.4%. In the study group, the most commonly used anticoagulant was rivaroxaban at 67.2%; followed by vitamin K antagonist (Acenocoumarol) at 12.6%.

- Conclusion: The rate of using triple antithrombotic therapy was higher than dual antithrombotic therapy in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Bleeding events in patients using TAT regimen were higher than those using DAT regimen (p<0.05).

References

1.
Jacobs MS, Tieleman RG. Optimal antithrombotic treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: triple therapy is too much!. Neth Heart J. 2018;26(6):334-340. doi:10.1007/s12471-018-1120-6
2.
Valle FH, Goodman SG, Tan M, et al. Antithrombotic Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Findings From the CONNECT AF+PCI Study. CJC Open. 2021;3(12):1419-1427. doi:10.1016/j.cjco.2021.07.003
3.
Vranckx P, Valgimigli M, Eckardt L, et al. Edoxaban-based versus vitamin K antagonist-based antithrombotic regimen after successful coronary stenting in patients with atrial fibrillation (ENTRUST-AF PCI): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial. Lancet. 2019;394(10206):1335-1343. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31872-0
4.
Lopes RD, Hong H, Harskamp RE, et al. Optimal Antithrombotic Regimens for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Updated Network Meta-analysis. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(5):582-589. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2019.6175
5.
Bor WL, de Veer AJW, Olie RH, et al. Dual versus triple antithrombotic therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention: the prospective multicentre WOEST 2 Study. EuroIntervention. 2022;18(4):e303-e313. doi:10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00703

Files

Article Views200
Document Views0
Downloads0
Section NGHIÊN CỨU LÂM SÀNG
Issue Số 110
Category BỆNH RỐI LOẠN NHỊP TIM