Tạp chí Tim mạch học Việt Nam

Article detail

Article detail description

Home
NGHIÊN CỨU LÂM SÀNG Issue: Số 108 BỆNH MẠCH VÀNH

Results of rotablation for calcified coronary artery lesions at Vietnam National Heart Institute, Bach Mai Hospital

Nguyễn Hữu Tuấn: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam, Bệnh viện Bạch Mai; Phạm Mạnh Hùng: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam, Bệnh viện Bạch Mai; Phạm Nhật Minh: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam, Bệnh viện Bạch Mai; Nguyễn Ngọc Quang: Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội;
Published: March 31, 2024
Views: 180
DOI 10.58354/jvc.108.2024.816

Abstract

Introduction: Coronary calcification intervention remains a challenge for interventional cardiologists. While there have been studies on Rotablator-assisted calcified plaque intervention around the world, there have been no studies conducted in Vietnam on this issue.

Objective: To evaluate early and midterm outcomes within 3 months of Rotablator-assisted coronary calcification intervention.

Subjects and methods: Thirty-three patients who underwent Rotablator-assisted calcified plaque intervention at Vietnam National Heart Institute - Bach Mai Hospital from 2019 to 2022 were included in the study.

Results: The success rate of the calcified plaque intervention was high, with a rate of 97.2%. The preservation rate of side branches was also high at 86.4% when using RA. Complications related to the calcified plaque intervention were low (slow flow rate, severe MV dissection, and access site complications had a rate of 2.8%) and no severe complications requiring emergency treatment occurred. Most patients experienced improvement in angina.

Conclusion: Rotablator-assisted calcified plaque intervention for coronary calcification at Vietnam National Heart Institute - Bach Mai Hospital is safe and has a low mortality rate.

References

1.
Genereux P, Madhavan MV, Mintz GS, et al. Ischemic outcomes after coronary intervention of calcified vessels in acute coronary syndromes. Pooled analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI (Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) and ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) TRIALS. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(18):1845-54. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.034
2.
Bourantas CV, Zhang YJ, Garg S, et al. Prognostic implications of coronary calcification in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease treated by percutaneous coronary intervention: a patient-level pooled analysis of 7 contemporary stent trials. Heart. 2014;100(15):1158-64. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2013-305180
3.
Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(24):e44-122. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.007
4.
Abdel-Wahab M, Richardt G, Joachim Buttner H, et al. High-speed rotational atherectomy before paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation in complex calcified coronary lesions: the randomized ROTAXUS (Rotational Atherectomy Prior to Taxus Stent Treatment for Complex Native Coronary Artery Disease) trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(1):10-9. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2012.07.017
5.
Madhavan MV, Tarigopula M, Mintz GS, et al. Coronary artery calcification: pathogenesis and prognostic implications. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(17):1703-14. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.017
6.
Correction to: High-Speed Rotational Atherectomy Versus Modified Balloons Before Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions: The Randomized PREPARE-CALC Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(10):e000040. doi:10.1161/HCV.0000000000000040
7.
D'ASCENZO F, Colombo F, Barbero U, et al. Discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy over 12 months after acute coronary syndromes increases risk for adverse events in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: Systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of interventional cardiology. 2014;27(3):233-241.
8.
D'Ascenzo F, Presutti DG, Picardi E, et al. Prevalence and non-invasive predictors of left main or three-vessel coronary disease: evidence from a collaborative international meta-analysis including 22 740 patients. Heart. 2012;98(12):914-919.
9.
Jneid H. The 2012 ACCF/AHA focused update of the unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (UA/NSTEMI) guideline: a critical appraisal. Methodist DeBakey Cardiovascular Journal. 2012;8(3):26.
10.
Iannaccone M, Piazza F, Boccuzzi GG, et al. ROTational AThErectomy in acute coronary syndrome: early and midterm outcomes from a multicentre registry. EuroIntervention. 2016;12(12):1457-1464. doi:10.4244/EIJ-D-15-00485
11.
Qaqish O, Sharma S, Kumar A, et al. Rotational Atherectomy in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022;42:143-153. doi:10.1016/j.carrev.2022.02.020
12.
Goodman WG, London G, Amann K, et al. Vascular calcification in chronic kidney disease. American journal of kidney diseases. 2004;43(3):572-579.
13.
Pham MH. Interventional Cardiology. Medical Publishing House; 2022.
14.
Ma JY, Guo JJ, Hou L, et al. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2018;46(4):274-278. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2018.04.005
15.
Wang J, Huang J, Yakubu AS, et al. Safety and Feasibility of Rotational Atherectomy for Retrograde Recanalization of Chronically Occluded Coronary Arteries. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:854757. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2022.854757
16.
Kini A, Sharma S, Narula J. Practical manual of interventional cardiology. Springer; 2021.
17.
Iannaccone M, Barbero U, D'ascenzo F, et al. Rotational atherectomy in very long lesions: Results for the ROTATE registry. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2016;88(6):E164-E172.
18.
Ielasi A, Kawamoto H, Latib A, et al. In-hospital and 1-year outcomes of rotational atherectomy and stent implantation in patients with severely calcified unprotected left main narrowings (from the Multicenter ROTATE Registry). The American Journal of Cardiology. 2017;119(9):1331-1337.
19.
Rashid MK, Nazanin Sahami M, Singh K, et al. Ultrasound guidance in femoral artery catheterization: a systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Invasive Cardiology. 2019;31(7)
20.
Demir OM, Poletti E, Lombardo F, et al. Rotational atherectomy-based percutaneous coronary intervention and the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2020;68(2):137-145. doi:10.23736/S0026-4725.20.05099-9
21.
Mustafa SJ, Morrison R, Teng B, et al. Adenosine receptors and the heart: role in regulation of coronary blood flow and cardiac electrophysiology. Adenosine Receptors in Health and Disease. 2009:161-188.
22.
Kawamoto H, Latib A, Ruparelia N, et al. Planned versus provisional rotational atherectomy for severe calcified coronary lesions: Insights From the ROTATE multi-center registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;88(6):881-889. doi:10.1002/ccd.26411
23.
Cao CF, Ma YL, Li Q, et al. Comparison of bailout and planned rotational atherectomy for severe coronary calcified lesions. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020;20(1):374. doi:10.1186/s12872-020-01645-4
24.
Tomey MI, Kini AS, Sharma SK. Current status of rotational atherectomy. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2014;7(4):345-353.
25.
Safian RD, Feldman T, Muller DW, et al. Coronary angioplasty and Rotablator atherectomy trial (CARAT): immediate and late results of a prospective multicenter randomized trial. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions. 2001;53(2):213-220.
26.
Whitlow PL, Bass TA, Kipperman RM, et al. Results of the study to determine rotablator and transluminal angioplasty strategy (STRATAS). The American journal of cardiology. 2001;87(6):699-705.
27.
Barbato E, Carrié D, Dardas P, et al. European expert consensus on rotational atherectomy. EuroIntervention. 2015;11(1):30-36.
28.
Sharma SK, Tomey MI, Teirstein PS, et al. North American expert review of rotational atherectomy. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2019;12(5):e007448.
29.
Kawamoto H, Latib A, Ruparelia N, et al. In-hospital and midterm clinical outcomes of rotational atherectomy followed by stent implantation: the ROTATE multicentre registry. EuroIntervention: journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2016;12(12):1448-1456.
30.
Stone GW, Mehran R, Dangas G, et al. Differential impact on survival of electrocardiographic Q-wave versus enzymatic myocardial infarction after percutaneous intervention: a device-specific analysis of 7147 patients. Circulation. 2001;104(6):642-647.
31.
Yang X, Tamez H, Lai C, et al. Type 4a myocardial infarction: incidence, risk factors, and long‐term outcomes. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2017;89(5):849-856.
32.
McEntegart M, Corcoran D, Carrick D, et al. Incidence of procedural myocardial infarction and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging-detected myocardial injury following percutaneous coronary intervention with rotational atherectomy. EuroIntervention. 2018;14(7):819-823. doi:10.4244/EIJ-D-17-01077
33.
Fitzgerald PJ, Ports TA, Yock PG. Contribution of localized calcium deposits to dissection after angioplasty. An observational study using intravascular ultrasound. Circulation. 1992;86(1):64-70. doi:10.1161/01.cir.86.1.64
34.
Shimony A, Zahger D, Van Straten M, et al. Incidence, risk factors, management and outcomes of coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention. The American journal of cardiology. 2009;104(12):1674-1677.
35.
Brown DL, Giordano F, Buchbinder M. 720-4 Coronary Dissection Following Rotational Atherectomy: Clinical Characteristics, Angiographic Predictors and Acute Outcomes. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1995;25(2):123A.
36.
Jinnouchi H, Sakakura K, Taniguchi Y, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-factors associated with slow flow following rotational atherectomy in heavily calcified coronary artery. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):5674. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-09585-z
37.
Cao CF, Ma YL, Li Q, et al. White thrombi on optical coherence tomography after rotational atherectomy of severely calcified coronary lesions. Herz. 2022;Nachweis weisser Thromben in der optischen Koharenztomographie nach Rotationsatherektomie von stark kalzifizierten Koronarlasionen. doi:10.1007/s00059-021-05073-8
38.
Godino C. Complications of percutaneous coronary intervention. PanVascular Medicine, Second Edition. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2015:2297-2322.
39.
Watt J, Oldroyd KG. Radial versus femoral approach for high‐speed rotational atherectomy. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2009;74(4):550-554.
40.
You W, Wu XQ, Ye F, et al. Advantages of Transradial Rotational Atherectomy versus Transfemoral Approach in Elderly Patients with Hard-Handling Calcified Coronary Lesions - A Single Center Experience. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2018;34(6):464-471. doi:10.6515/ACS.201811_34(6).20180427A
41.
Kubler P, Zimoch W, Kosowski M, et al. In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with rotational atherectomy radial access is safer and as efficient as femoral access. J Interv Cardiol. 2018;31(4):471-477. doi:10.1111/joic.12496
42.
Pawlowski T, Sliwinski Z, Modzelewski P, et al. Guiding catheter extension facilities high speed rotational atherectomy for distal right coronary artery lesion. Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2020;16(4):507-508. doi:10.5114/aic.2020.101779
43.
Megaly M, Sandoval Y, Lillyblad MP, et al. Aminophylline for Preventing Bradyarrhythmias During Orbital or Rotational Atherectomy of the Right Coronary Artery. J Invasive Cardiol. 2018;30(5):186-189.

Files

PDF
Article Views180
Document Views0
Downloads0
Section NGHIÊN CỨU LÂM SÀNG
Issue Số 108
Category BỆNH MẠCH VÀNH

Related articles section label

Related articles

Related articles category hint

More articles

NT-proBNP reflects myocardial injury phenotype in acute coronary syndromes: A cross-sectional study in a predominantly unstable angina population

Objective: To evaluate the value of NT-proBNP in relation to myocardial injury markers and the extent of coronary artery disease, thereby clarifying its role according to myocardial injury phenotype in acute coronary syn...

Chi tiết bài báo
PDF
DOI: 10.58354/jvc.120.2026.1306
88
Đoàn Ngọc Anh; Nguyễn Quốc Khoa; Dương Thị Thu Hằng; Võ Lương Tài; Trương Thị Huyền; Đặng Thế Việt; Võ Phạm Minh Thư; Đặng Thị Phương Thảo

Study of left ventricular function using tissue-tracking echocardiography in patients with chronic coronary syndrome without indications for coronary revascularization

Objectives: To evaluate the index of global left ventricular longitudinal strain (GLS) and its relationship with some clinical and paraclinical parameters in patients with chronic coronary artery syndrome without indicat...

Chi tiết bài báo
DOI: 10.58354/jvc.111.2024.866
114
Mai Thị Thương; Nguyễn Văn Thành; Đỗ Doãn Lợi