Home
CHUYÊN ĐỀ
Issue: Số 74 (2016)
Article
Đinh Huỳnh Linh: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam - Bệnh viện Bạch Mai;
Phạm Mạnh Hùng: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam - Bệnh viện Bạch Mai;
Published: August 1, 2016
Views: 157
References
1.
1. Holmes, D.R., Jr., et al., 2012 ACCF/ AATS/SCAl/STS expert consensus document on transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JAm Coll Cardiol, 2012. 59( 13): p. 1200-54.
2.
2. lung, B., et al., Decision-making in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis: why are so many denied surgery? Eur Heart], 2005. 26(24): p. 2714-20.
3.
3. Wenaweser, P., et al., Clinical outcomes of patients with estimated low or intermediate surgical risk undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Eur Heart], 2013. 34(25): p. 1894-905.
4.
4. Cribier, A., et al.,Percutaneous transluminal balloon valvuloplasty of adult aortic stenosis: report of 92 cases.] Am Coll Cardiol, 1987. 9(2): p. 381-6.
5.
5. Ben-Dor, I., et al.,Complications and outcome of balloon aortic valvuloplasty in high-risk or inoperable patients.JACC Cardiovasclnterv, 2010. 3(11): p. 1150-6.
6.
6. Svensson, L.G., et al., A comprehensive review of the PARTNER trial.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2013.
7.
(3 Suppl): p. S11-6.
8.
7. Nguyen Lan Vi t,ThzJc hanh b¢nh Tim mi;ich 3ed. 2012: Nha xuat ban Y H9c
9.
8. Sharma, U.C., et al.,Systematic review of the outcome of aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis. Ann Thorac Surg, 2004. 78(1): p. 90-5.
10.
9. van Geldorp, M.W., et al.,Therapeutic decisions for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: room for improvement? Eur] Cardiothorac Surg, 2009. 35( 6): p. 953-7; discussion 957.
11.
10. Cribier, A., et al.,Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis: first human case description. Circulation, 2002. 106(24): p. 3006-8.
12.
11. Zajarias, A. and A.G. Cribier,Outcomes and safety of percutaneous aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009. 53(20): p. 1829-36.
13.
12. Webb,J.G. and D.A. Wood, Current status of transcatheter aortic valve replacement.] Am Coll Cardiol, 2012. 60(6): p. 483-92.
14.
13. D'Ascenzo, F., et al.,Inaccuracy of available surgical risk scores to predict outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.] Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown), 2013. 14(12): p. 894-8.
15.
14. Binder, R.K., et al., Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the SAPIEN 3: a new balloon expandable transcatheter heart valve.JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2013. 6(3): p. 293-300.
16.
15. Smith, C.R., et al., Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl] Med, 2011. 364(23): p. 2187-98.
17.
16. Leon, M.B., et al., Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl] Med, 2010. 363(17): p. 1597-607.
18.
17. Carabello, B.A.,Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. Curr Cardiol Rep, 2011. 13 (3): p. 173-4.
19.
18. Guyton, R.A., The Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve (PARTNER) trial: the surgeon's perspective: celebration and concern. Circulation, 2012. 125(25): p. 3237-9.
20.
19. Kallikazaros, I.E.,Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: current status and future prospects. Hellenic J Cardiol, 2014. 55(4): p. 349-50.
21.
20. A, L., One year outcomes in real world patients treated with TAVI: the advance study. Euro Intervention. Euro PCR2013.
22.
21. Eggebrecht, H., et al., Risk of stroke after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TA VI): a meta analysis of 10,037 published patients. Eurolntervention, 2012. 8(1): p. 129-38.
23.
22. Athappan, G., et al.,Incidence, predictors, and outcomes of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: meta-analysis and systematic review of literature.] Am Coll Cardiol, 2013. 61(15): p. 1585-95.