No translate

Trần Văn Đồng; Phan Đình Phong; Trần Song Giang; Phạm Trần Linh; Lê Võ Kiên

doi:10.58354/jvc.8485.2018.1128

Home

CHUYÊN ĐỀ Issue: Số 84+85 , 2019 BỆNH SUY TIM

No translate

Published: October 19, 2026

10.58354/jvc.8485.2018.1128

Abstract

No translate

Keywords

No translate

References

1. Pluijmert M, Lumens J, Potse M et al (2015) Computer modelling for better diagnosis and therapy of patients by cardiac resynchronisation therapy. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev 4:62–67.

DOI: doi.org/10.15420/aer.2015.4.1.62

2. Kerckhoffs RC, McCulloch AD, Omens JH, Mulligan LJ (2009) Effects of biventricular pacing and scar size in a computational model of the failing heart with left bundle branch block. Med Image Anal 13:362–369.

DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2008.06.013

3. Niederer SA, Shetty AK, Plank G et al (2012) Biophysical modeling to simulate the response to multisite left ventricular stimulation using a quadripolar pacing lead. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 35:204–214.

DOI: doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03243.x

4. Turakhia MP, Cao M, Fischer A et al (2016) Reduced mortality associated with quadripolar compared to bipolar left ventricular leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2:426–433.

DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2016.02.007

5. Yang M, Li X, Liang J, Asirvatham SJ, Espinosa R, Li Y, Friedman PA, Cha YM (2018) Outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy using left ventricular quadripolar leads. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.13388 (Epub ahead of print).

DOI: doi.org/10.1111/pace.13388

6. Behar JM, Jackson T, Hyde E et al (2016) Optimized left ventricular endocardial stimulation is superior to optimized epicardial stimulation in ischemic patients with poor response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a combined magnetic resonance imaging, electroanatomic contact mapping, and hemodynamic study to target endocardial lead placement. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2:799–809.

DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2016.04.006

7. Sieniewicz BJ, Behar JM, Gould J et al (2018) Guidance for optimal site selection of a leadless LV endocardial electrode improvesacute hemodynamic response and chronic remodeling. JACC Clin Electrophysiol (article in press).

DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2018.03.011

8. Niazi I, Baker J II, Corbisiero R, Love C, Martin D, Sheppard R, Worley SJ, Varma N, Lee K, Tomassoni G (2017) MPP Investigators. Safety and efficacy of multipoint pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: the MultiPoint Pacing Trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 3:1510–1518.

DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2017.06.022

9. Vijayaraman P, Naperkowski A, Ellenbogen KA et al (2015) Electrophysiologic insights into site of atrioventricular block: lessons from permanent His bundle pacing. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 1:571–581.

DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2015.09.012

10.

10. Parthiban N, Esterman A, Mahajan R et al (2015) Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter- defibrillators: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol 65:2591–2600.

DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.04.029

11.

11. Hindricks G, Taborsky M, Glikson M et al (2014) Implant-based multiparameter telemonitoring of patients with heart failure (INTIME): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 384:583–590.

DOI: doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61176-4

12.

12. Varma N, Piccini JP, Snell J et al (2015) The relationship between level of adherence to automatic wireless remote monitoring and survival in pacemaker and defibrillator patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 65:2601–2610.

DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.04.033

Tác giả

Trần Văn Đồng: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam - Bệnh viện Bạch Mai; Phan Đình Phong: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam - Bệnh viện Bạch Mai; Trần Song Giang: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam - Bệnh viện Bạch Mai; Phạm Trần Linh: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam - Bệnh viện Bạch Mai; Lê Võ Kiên: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam - Bệnh viện Bạch Mai;