Tạp chí Tim mạch học Việt Nam

Article detail

Article detail description

Home
NGHIÊN CỨU LÂM SÀNG Issue: Số 94+95 , 2021

Article

Trần Việt Dũng: Bác sĩ nội trú, Đại học Y Hà Nội; Phạm Nhật Minh: Bộ môn Tim mạch - Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội; Phạm Mạnh Hùng: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam - Bệnh viện Bạch Mai;
Published: March 1, 2021
Views: 261
No abstract or full text is available for this article.

References

1.
1. HunzikerL.,RadovanovicD.,JegerR.vàcộngsự.(2019). Twenty-Year Trends in the Incidence and Outcome of Cardiogenic Shock in AMIS Plus Registry. Circ:CardiovascularInterventions, 12(4).
2.
2. GoldbergR.J.,SamadN.A.,YarzebskiJ.vàcộngsự.(1999). Temporal Trends in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med, 340(15), 1162–1168.
3.
3. BabaevA.,FrederickP.D.,Pasta D.J. và cộng sự. Trends in Management and Outcomes of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock. 7.
4.
4. Valente S., Lazzeri C., Vecchio S. và cộng sự. (2007). Predictors of in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock. International Journal of Cardiology, 114(2), 176–182.
5.
5. Demondion P., Fournel L., Golmard J.-L. và cộng sự. (2014). Predictors of 30-day mortality and outcome in cases of myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock treated by extracorporeal life support. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 45(1), 47–54.
6.
6. Sutton A.G.C. (2005). Predictors of outcome after percutaneous treatment for cardiogenic shock. Heart, 91(3), 339–344.
7.
7. ZeymerU.(2004). Predictors of in-hospital mortality in 1333 patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) Results of the primary PCI registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK). European Heart Journal, 25(4), 322–328.
8.
8. HarjolaV.-P.,LassusJ.,SionisA.vàcộngsự.(2015). Clinical picture and risk prediction of short-term mortality in cardiogenic shock: Clinical picture and outcome of cardiogenic shock. EurJHeartFail, 17(5), 501–509.
9.
9. Hasdai D., Holmes D.R., Califf R.M. và cộng sự. (1999). Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: Predictors of death. American Heart Journal, 138(1), 21–31.
10.
10. ThieleH.,ZeymerU.,NeumannF.-J.vàcộngsự.(2012). Intraaortic Balloon Support for Myocardial Infarction with Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med, 367(14), 1287–1296.
11.
11. Ueki Y., Mohri M., Matoba T. và cộng sự. (2016). Characteristics and Predictors of Mortality in Patients With Cardiovascular Shock in Japan– Results From the Japanese Circulation Society Cardiovascular Shock Registry –. Circ J, 80(4), 852–859.
12.
12. HelgestadO.K.L.,JosiassenJ.,HassagerC.vàcộngsự.(2019). Temporal trends in incidence and patient characteristics in cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction from 2010 to 2017: a Danish cohort study. Eur J Heart Fail, 21(11), 1370–1378.
13.
13. WhiteH.D.,PalmeriS.T.,SleeperL.A.vàcộngsự.(2004). Electrocardiographic findings in cardiogenic shock, risk prediction, and the effects of emergency revascularization: Results from the SHOCK trial. American Heart Journal, 148(5), 810–817.
14.
14. Lesage A., Ramakers M., Daubin C. và cộng sự. (2004). Complicated acute myocardial infarction requiring mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit: Prognostic factors of clinical outcome in a series of 157 patients*: Critical Care Medicine, 32(1), 100–105.

Files

Article Views261
Document Views0
Downloads0
Section NGHIÊN CỨU LÂM SÀNG