Tạp chí Tim mạch học Việt Nam

Article detail

Article detail description

Home
BÀI TỔNG QUAN Issue: Số 123 - 2026 TIM MẠCH CAN THIỆP

Update on Percutaneous Carotid Artery Intervention 2026

Published: October 30, 2026
Views: 34

Abstract

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is an alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for stroke prevention in carotid stenosis. This review updates the indications and procedural technique of CAS up to 2026, based on the 2024 ESC guidelines, the 2024 CIRSE standards of practice, and recently published trials and registries. CREST-2 showed that, in asymptomatic stenosis ≥70%, CAS plus intensive medical management reduced 4-year stroke compared with medical management alone (2.8% vs 6.0%); ECST-2 found no benefit in low-risk patients. The technique is described step by step - assessment of the aortic arch and lesion, access, catheter selection and guiding placement, cerebral protection, balloon angioplasty and stenting - and illustrated with angiographic images and a clinical case. Micromesh stents, integrated protection and transcarotid revascularisation with flow reversal achieved 30-day event rates of 0.6-2.3%. Further randomised trials of new techniques are needed. CAS is effective when properly indicated and performed according to a standardised protocol.

Keywords
carotid stenosis carotid artery stenting indication cerebral embolic protection micromesh stent CREST-2

References

1.
Spiliopoulos S, Blanc R, Gandini R, et al. CIRSE standards of practice on carotid artery stenting. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024;47(6):705-716. doi:10.1007/s00270-024-03707-y
2.
Mazzolai L, Teixido-Tura G, Lanzi S, et al. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases. Eur Heart J. 2024;45(36):3538-3700. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae179
3.
Halliday A, Bulbulia R, Bonati LH, et al. Second asymptomatic carotid surgery trial (ACST-2): a randomised comparison of carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy. Lancet. 2021;398(10305):1065-1073. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01910-3
4.
Brott TG, Howard G, Lal BK, et al. Medical management and revascularization for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2026;394(3):219-231. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2508800
5.
Donners SJA, van Velzen TJ, Cheng SF, et al. Optimised medical therapy alone versus optimised medical therapy plus revascularisation for asymptomatic or low-to-intermediate risk symptomatic carotid stenosis (ECST-2): 2-year interim results of a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2025;24(5):389-399. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(25)00107-3
6.
Langhoff R, Vajda Z, Odrowąż-Pieniążek P, et al. 30-day outcomes of real-world elective carotid stenosis treatment using a dual-layer micromesh stent (ROADSAVER study). Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2025;48(4):427-437. doi:10.1007/s00270-025-04003-z
7.
Metzger DC, Soukas P, Siddiqui A, et al. Safety and efficacy of a novel micro net carotid stent system: results of the C-GUARDIANS trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025;18(24):3087-3097. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2025.09.027
8.
Gray WA, Metzger DC, Zidar J, et al. The PERFORMANCE II trial: a prospective multicenter investigation of a novel carotid stent system. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025;18(3):367-376. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2024.10.031
9.
Lyden SP, Mendes RR, Mouawad NJ, et al. Thirty-day outcomes following transcarotid artery revascularization with integrated embolic protection: the PERFORMANCE III study. J Vasc Surg. 2026;84(4):951-960.e3. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2026.05.027
10.
Jim J, Dermody M, Peterson B, et al. Prospective, multicenter evaluation of transcarotid artery revascularization in standard-risk patients: 30-day outcomes of the ROADSTER 3 study. Ann Neurol. 2026;99(3):705-712. doi:10.1002/ana.78104
11.
North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(7):445-453. doi:10.1056/NEJM199108153250701
12.
Gray WA, Rosenfield KA, Jaff MR, et al. Influence of site and operator characteristics on carotid artery stent outcomes: analysis of the CAPTURE 2 (Carotid ACCULINK/ACCUNET Post Approval Trial to Uncover Rare Events) clinical study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4(2):235-246. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2010.10.009
13.
Straus S, Yadavalli SD, Allievi S, et al. Seven years of the transcarotid artery revascularization surveillance project, comparison to transfemoral stenting and endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg. 2024;80(5):1455-1463. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2024.05.048
14.
Columbo JA, Martinez-Camblor P, Stone DH, et al. Effectiveness of transcarotid vs transfemoral carotid stenting for stroke prevention. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(4):e259143. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.9143
15.
Elsayed N, Yei KS, Naazie I, et al. The impact of carotid lesion calcification on outcomes of carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg. 2022;75(3):921-929. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2021.08.095

Tác giả

Phạm Nhật Minh: Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội; Nguyễn Vân Anh: Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội; Phạm Đình Vụ: Bệnh viện Đại học Y Hà Nội; Nguyễn Bá Ninh: Bệnh viện Đại học Y Hà Nội; Nguyễn Văn Hiếu: Bệnh viện Đại học Y Hà Nội; Trần Bảo Trang: Bệnh viện Đại học Y Hà Nội; Lê Văn Thăng: Bệnh viện Đại học Y Hà Nội;
Update on Percutaneous Carotid Artery Intervention 2026

Files

Article Views34
Document Views0
Downloads6
Section BÀI TỔNG QUAN
Category TIM MẠCH CAN THIỆP
Pages 74-91
Copyright Holder 2026 Tạp chí Tim mạch học Việt Nam