Tạp chí Tim mạch học Việt Nam

Article detail

Article detail description

Home
NGHIÊN CỨU LÂM SÀNG Issue: Issue 99, 2022

Article

Hà Thị Hưởng: Đại học Y Hà Nội; Khổng Nam Hương: Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam, Bệnh viện Bạch Mai;
Published: November 1, 2021
Views: 149

Abstract

Background: Right ventrical function has recently gained attention as a prognostic predictor of outcome event in patients who have left - sided heart failure. Since several convensional echocardiographic parameters of right ventrical function have been proposed, our aim was to determine if any parameters are assosiated with outcome in heart failure reduced ejection fraction.
Methods: 119 heart failure reduced ejection fraction patients were enrolled in this study, followed up and evaluated after 3 - 6 months.
Results: 57,1% patients have right ventrical systolic dysfunction, 80% patients have right ventrical diastolic dysfunction and 46.2% patients have right ventrical diastolic and systolic dysfunction. 50 events (42%) occured :20 deaths (15,8%), 30 readmissions (26,2%). A Kaplan - Meier curve showed that the survival rate of the right ventrical systolic dysfunction group was significaltly lower than group with no right ventrical systolic dysfunction. A multivariate Cox regression model identified that right ventrical systolic dysfunction was an independent predictor of 6 month mortality and readmission.
Conclusion: Righ ventrical systolic dysfunction was an independent predictor in patients with heart failure reduced ejection fraction.

References

1.
1. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Accessed June 26, 2020. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact- sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds)
2.
2. Scruth EA, Cheng E, Worrall-Carter L. Risk score comparison of outcomes in patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: EurJCardiovascNurs. Published online June 13, 2012.
3.
3. Selvarajah S, Fong AYY, Selvaraj G, Haniff J, Uiterwaal CSPM, Bots ML. An Asian Validation of the TIMI Risk Score for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. PLOSONE. 2012;7(7):e40249.
4.
4. Chun BY, Dobson AJ, Heller RF. The Impact of Diabetes on Survival Among Patients With First Myocardial Infarction. Diabetes Care. 1997;20(5):704-708.
5.
5. So sánh giá trị của các thang điểm nguy cơ trong tiên lượng bệnh nhân nhồi máu cơ tim cấp. Luận Văn Y Học. Published November 14, 2018. Accessed June 24, 2020.
6.
6. Luận án So sánh giá trị của các thang điểm nguy cơ trong tiên lượng bệnh nhân nhồi máu cơ tim cấp - Luận văn, đồ án, đề tài tốt nghiệp. Accessed June 24, 2020.
7.
7. Krumholz HM, Normand S-LT, Wang Y. Trends in Hospitalizations and Outcomes for Acute Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke, 1999–2011. Circulation. 2014;130(12):966-975.
8.
8. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2012 Update | Circulation. Accessed June 26, 2020. https://www. ahajournals.org.
9.
9. Chang W-C, Kaul P, Fu Y, et al. Forecasting mortality: dynamic assessment of risk in ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. EurHeartJ. 2006;27(4):419-426. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi700
10.
10. Correia LCL, Garcia G, Kalil F, et al. Prognostic Value of TIMI Score versus GRACE Score in ST- segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2014;103:98-106.
11.
11. Morrow David A., Antman Elliott M., Charlesworth Andrew, et al. TIMI Risk Score for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Convenient, Bedside, Clinical Score for Risk Assessment at Presentation. Circulation. 2000;102(17):2031-2037.
12.
12. Méndez-Eirín E, Flores-Ríos X, García-López F, et al. Comparison of the Prognostic Predictive Value of the TIMI, PAMI, CADILLAC, and GRACE Risk Scores in STEACS Undergoing Primary or Rescue PCI. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2012;65(3):227-233.

Files

Article Views149
Document Views0
Downloads0
Section NGHIÊN CỨU LÂM SÀNG