Tạp chí Tim mạch học Việt Nam

Article detail

Article detail description

Home
NGHIÊN CỨU LÂM SÀNG Issue: Số 121 - 2026 NGHIÊN CỨU CƠ BẢN VỀ TIM MẠCH

Prediction Model for Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Vietnamese Patients: A Clinical–Electrocardiographic Approach

Nguyễn Thị Bạch Yến: Bệnh viện Đa khoa Tâm Anh Hà Nội; Trần Đức Minh: Bệnh viện Đa khoa Tâm Anh Hà Nội; Nguyễn Quốc Khánh: Bệnh viện Đa khoa Tâm Anh Hà Nội; Nguyễn Thị Oanh: Bệnh viện Đa khoa Tâm Anh Hà Nội; Nguyễn Hoài Vũ: Bệnh viện Đa khoa Tâm Anh Hà Nội; Tô Đức Minh: Bệnh viện Đa khoa Tâm Anh Hà Nội;
Published: May 30, 2026
Views: 87

Abstract

Objective: Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is an important marker of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Although echocardiography is the diagnostic standard, its limited availability in many Asian settings—including Vietnam—necessitates simple and accessible screening tools. Classical electrocardiographic (ECG) voltage criteria have shown modest diagnostic accuracy in Asian populations. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of three established ECG criteria and develop a pragmatic clinical–electrocardiographic model for predicting LVH in Vietnamese patients. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional retrospective study of 1,026 adults who underwent both transthoracic echocardiography and 12-lead ECG during the same clinical encounter at Tam Anh Hospital from September to December 2023. LVH was defined by LV mass index ≥116 g/m² in men or ≥96 g/m² in women. ECG voltages were measured according to Sokolow–Lyon, Cornell, and Peguero–Lo Presti criteria. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors and develop a point-based LVH prediction model. Results: Classical ECG criteria demonstrated limited diagnostic performance, with AUC values of 0.561 (Sokolow–Lyon), 0.587 (Cornell), and 0.609 (Peguero–Lo Presti). Multivariable analysis identified five independent predictors of LVH: age ≥65 years, female sex, hypertension, heart failure, and a positive Sokolow–Lyon index. The resulting five-factor scoring model achieved an AUC of 0.805, with sensitivity 79.4% and specificity 67.4% at the optimal cutoff. Conclusion: In the Vietnamese population, ECG voltage criteria alone show modest diagnostic accuracy for LVH. Integrating key clinical characteristics with ECG findings significantly improves prediction performance. The proposed model provides a simple, feasible, and resource-appropriate tool for LVH screening in settings with limited access to echocardiography.

Keywords
Left ventricular hypertrophy electrocardiogram Sokolow-Lyon Peguero-Lo Presti Cornell

References

1.
Nadruz W. Myocardial remodeling in hypertension. J Hum Hypertens. 2015;29(1):1-6. doi:10.1038/jhh.2014.36.
2.
Kuroda K. Hypertensive cardiomyopathy: a clinical approach and literature review. World J Hypertens. 2015;5(2):41-52. doi:10.5494/wjh.v5.i2.41.
3.
Seko Y, Kato T, Yamaji Y, et al. Discrepancy between left ventricular hypertrophy by echocardiography and electrocardiographic hypertrophy: clinical characteristics and outcomes. Open Heart. 2021;8(2):e001765. doi:10.1136/openhrt-2021-001765.
4.
Hancock EW, Deal BJ, Mirvis DM, Okin P, Kligfield P, Gettes LS. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part V: electrocardiogram changes associated with cardiac chamber hypertrophy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(11):992-1002. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.12.015.
5.
Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005;18(12):1440-1463. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2005.10.005.
6.
Aquaro GD, Corsi E, Todiere G, et al. Magnetic resonance for differential diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy: diagnostic and prognostic implications. J Clin Med. 2022;11(3):651. doi:10.3390/jcm11030651.
7.
Peguero JG, Lo Presti S, Perez J, Issa O, Brenes JC, Tolentino A. Electrocardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(13):1694-1703. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.037.
8.
Grossman W, Paulus WJ. Myocardial stress and hypertrophy: a complex interface between biophysics and cardiac remodeling. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(9):3701-3703. doi:10.1172/JCI69830.
9.
Naderi H, Ramírez J, Van Duijvenboden S, et al. Predicting left ventricular hypertrophy from the 12-lead electrocardiogram in the UK Biobank imaging study using machine learning. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2023;4(4):316-324. doi:10.1093/ehjdh/ztad037.
10.
Ye C, Wang T, Gong J, et al. Development of a nomogram for screening the risk of left ventricular hypertrophy in Chinese hypertensive patients. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2021;23(6):1176-1185. doi:10.1111/jch.14240.
11.
Ta HH, Pham NH, Phan DP. Comparison of Cornell and Sokolow-Lyon electrocardiographic indices in the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with essential hypertension. Vietnam Med J. 2021;508(1). doi:10.51298/vmj.v508i1.1539.
12.
Nguyen TH, Do DT, Dao HQ, Pham TL. Role of the Peguero-Lo Presti index in the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with aortic valve disease. Vietnam Med J. 2022;519(1). doi:10.51298/vmj.v519i1.3541.
13.
Luangphiphat W, Phaisitkriengkrai A, Methavigul R, Methavigul K. Peguero-Lo Presti criteria modified by body surface area for the electrocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in Thai patients. Asian Biomed (Res Rev News). 2021;15(2):101-107. doi:10.2478/abm-2021-0012.
14.
Yu Z, Song J, Cheng L, et al. Peguero-Lo Presti criteria for the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021;16(1):e0246305. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0246305.
15.
Jamiolkowski J, Chlabicz M, Paniczko M, et al. Clinical variables improve efficacy of ECG scores to diagnose left ventricular hypertrophy in the general population. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(Suppl 2):ehaa946.2918. doi:10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.2918.
16.
Wu Z, Shi M, Wang L, Yao Y. Identification of major risk factors and nonlinear effects associated with the development of left ventricular hypertrophy in chronic kidney disease by constructing and validating nomograms. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:914800. doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.914800.
Prediction Model for Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Vietnamese Patients: A Clinical–Electrocardiographic Approach

Files

Article Views87
Document Views8
Downloads2
Section NGHIÊN CỨU LÂM SÀNG
Category NGHIÊN CỨU CƠ BẢN VỀ TIM MẠCH
Pages 42-50
Copyright Holder 2026 Tạp chí Tim mạch học Việt Nam